Sunday, December 8, 2019
Organizational Bureaucracy and Public Choice â⬠MyAssignmenthelp.com
Question: Discuss about the Organizational Bureaucracy and Public Choice. Answer: The Fate of the Common Moral Purpose Phrase I believe that the term used by Barnard on common moral purpose is not a good way of describing organizations (Scott Davis 2015).Work can never be moral but rather morally neutral; this is because the rules and policies established in organizations are never meant to favor a particular group of employees but to help an organization achieve its goals and visions. Secondly, describing organizations as moral may limit the growth and progress of organizations as there may be assumptions the organizations are better yet there may be a need to improve. On the contrary, the term moral purpose in an organizational content should not apply to the organizationmanagement structure but to the relationship among staff. The sense of bonding power between employees and organization administrators during work may be a great determinant to the creation of powerful and positive social function. Organizations can never be judged based on common moral purpose but rather on its independentstructure of management in understanding human motivation (Burke 2017). Essentially, employees are more social than economic beings that require several needs. The work environment is, therefore, a great influence on employees' performance. Morality in the organization is affected by the relationship betweenorganization management structure, the employees, and the clients. Finally, the control structures keep changing depending on global growths. Organizations can therefore not be embedded on common moral purpose but a neutral moral purpose. The neutral moral purpose of managing organizations is more flexible as it can quickly adapt to changes within the organization such as technological changes unlike the common moral purpose is based on rigidity. Organizational Bureaucracy The major obstacles that bureaucratic organizations faces in the verge of making the best decisions are rigidity stampedes creativity and impersonation (Dunleavy 2014). The bureaucratic systems are formed around rigid rules and regulations in that they require everything to work within a given system thus making it difficult for individuals to make decisions out-of-the box. Secondly, the impersonation practice rate in organizations is very high as bureaucratic organizations have fixed rules and regulations that are considered more important than human emotions. Decisions making are therefore only limited to top leadership; sometimes the leaders may not have the capacity to make right choices. High bureaucratic organizations have difficulties in making decisions especially in the modern world where systems have changed due to technological influence. Rigid organizations, therefore, find it hard to make best decisions as theirmanagement systems are based on fixed rules. Flexible organizations thus have mileage over rigid organizations as they find it easier to make decisions and solve problems. Problems that bureaucratic organizations deal with include population growth, technological revolution and economic conditions that have been caused by an increase in organizational complexities (Andrews Boyne 2014). The increase in organizational complexity has been prompted by strategies growth thus resulted in the changes in organizational management structures. Bureaucratic organizations, on the other hand, operate within centralized systems where the institutions are managed in centralized systems due to impersonation and rigidity in rules and regulations within the management structures. However, due to globalizations, economies have revolved, technologies have improved, and population continues to rise. Organizations that intend to stabilize are therefore forced to decentralize their systems to cope up with the strategies growth. References Andrews, R. and Boyne, G.A., 2014. Task complexity, organization size, and administrative intensity: The case of UK universities. Public Administration, 92(3), pp.656-672 Burke, W.W., 2017. Organization change: Theory and practice. Sage Publications Dunleavy, P., 2014. Democracy, bureaucracy and public choice: Economic approaches in political science. Routledge Scott, W.R., and Davis, G.F., 2015. Organizations and organizing: Rational, natural and open systems perspectives. Routledge
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.